[standards-jig] Re: [Foundation] streamlining the JIGs

Iain Shigeoka iainshigeoka at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 4 17:11:20 UTC 2002


On 3/3/02 8:56 AM, "DJ Adams" <dj.adams at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Iain Shigeoka wrote:
> 
>>> I think that one is in there?  If not it has been discussed before that the
>>> JEPs should come with a reference implementation in order to be accepted
>>> (Just made me think of patent issues and what not.  Might need to make this
>>> clear that it's a public reference?).
>> 
>> It was definitely discussed.  I don't think it was formalized into a
>> requirement though.  As far as patent issues that is an important factor to
> 
> I do seem to remember that I had to have a reference implementation[1] for
> Jabber-RPC before it could go to draft.

Hmm.  I think we made the suggestion (at a JSF meeting or on the list) but I
don't think it is an official requirement yet.

-iain


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




More information about the Standards mailing list