[standards-jig] [jepnews] JEP-0020: Client Feature Negotiation
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Mar 4 22:43:05 UTC 2002
> > Of course, it's probably a good thing to use consistent syntax, which is
> > why I like JEP-0020. I would just like to see it more explicitly spelled
> > out in the JEP that it defines a syntax only. For example, I don't think
> > the statement that jabber:iq:negotiate "would enable Jabber entities to
> > exchange packets to agree on feature options" captures this. We can do
> > that anyway, obviously, since Ashvil is already doing it. JEP-0020
> > simply defines a useful syntactic starting point for defining different
> > negotiation protocols.
> And it should be an informational JEP not standards track?
The intent was that this become a standard. Personally I'd like more
standards and less information -- providing that the standards are right,
More information about the Standards