[standards-jig] [jepnews] JEP-0021: Jabber Event Notification Service

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Tue Mar 5 02:30:55 UTC 2002


I'm reading it all again to make sure I didn't miss anything, but it
sounds like the elements still have to be valid within their DTD.  So
what's their root and where is it?  Am I misinterpreting something?

--temas


On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 18:05, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 3/4/02 4:12 PM, "Thomas Muldowney" <temas at box5.net> wrote:
> 
> > I disagree that it has to be a <query> element, but the usage of the
> > xmlns isn't correct currently in the spec. The xmlns has multiple root
> > elements, from a quick browse it seems to be <publish>, <subscribe> and
> > <unsubscribe>.  We need one root element or multiple namespaces.
> > 
> 
> Why do we need one root element (or multiple namespaces)? I'm not aware of
> any qualifications in the XML namespace spec that requires namespace'd
> fragments to have a root element...??
> 
> Frankly, I see the pub/sub stuff as fragments which we embed into other
> documents to gain additional functionality. I see nothing wrong with top
> level verbs (like publish/subscribe).
> 
> Diz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20020304/2925ac6d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list