[standards-jig] Question on JEP-0001

Iain Shigeoka iainshigeoka at yahoo.com
Fri May 3 22:49:05 UTC 2002

On 5/3/02 2:11 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:

> Yes, royalty-free licensing seems most appropriate. However, it seems that
> no IP claim is the norm here. Shall we have two sets of wording?
> 1. No IP claims -- this is the default.
> 2. If IP claim, royalty-free licensing.

> Make sense?


One thing that w3c has been wrestling with is people wanting to patent
standards proposals/technologies to preempt the possibility of someone else
patenting it.  From what I understand it can help if disputes arise later.
If you take this to Jabber Inc lawyers you might ask if that's something we
(JSF) might want to consider.


More information about the Standards mailing list