[standards-jig] Jabber URI JEP
temas at box5.net
Thu May 9 14:57:47 UTC 2002
Yeah, but we talked about changing those to better references such as a
website address. I think it makes the most sense to use jabber:
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 08:25, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Oh, definitely. We need to figure out the scheme first. We talked about
> using 'jabber:' but that might be problematic given that we use that as
> the prefix in all of the official namespaces.
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Robert Norris wrote:
> > > I just put together a first draft of a JEP for a Jabber URI scheme.
> > > Feedback is welcome even though it's still under construction. You can
> > > check it out here:
> > Just a thought; it may be beneficial before this JEP is standardised to
> > register the URI scheme identifier with IANA (outlined by RFC2717 and
> > RFC2718), to prevent any disputes in the future (which I can definently
> > see arising if we start using im: ;) ).
> > Rob.
> > --
> > Robert Norris GPG: 1024D/FC18E6C2
> > Email+Jabber: rob at cataclysm.cx Web: http://cataclysm.cx/
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards