justin at openaether.org
Mon Nov 4 08:44:43 UTC 2002
I am rather neutral on whether this should be a JEP, if it does become a
JEP its definitely informational and not standards track.
It seems to me that a Solutions Guide/Best Practices section on j.o is
needed. Where people can post implementation guidelines and various
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 02:42, Michael Brown wrote:
> Re: http://www.yabber.org/jep/webpresence/webpresence.xml
> > > Peter Saint-Andre:
> > >> I'm still not convinced that we need a JEP for this. It feels more like
> > >> implementation issue to me.
> > My first impression (from quick skimming of the recent list posts) makes
> > inclined to agree with Peter on this. However...
> I'm still surprised no one seems to want a JEP for this. This isn't about a
> implementation, but about defining a *standard* way for websites to
> interface with Jabber. This is a standards issue. And this is a big thing.
> The more Jabber is seen on the web, the more exposure it will get to
> prospective users.
> I know it doesn't change the Jabber protocol in anyway, but that is a *good*
> thing IMO. And as I have pointed out, there are many JEPs that already
> break this rule.
> If this isn't appropriate as a JEP can someone please explain why, and what
> the alternatives are. The main reason I wrote it up as a JEP in the first
> place, was because Jer suggested back in July that we create one and update
> it as things evolve:
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards