[standards-jig] LAST CALL: jabber:iq:private (JEP-0049)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Nov 21 18:43:49 UTC 2002

Will do today.

And I agree that a standards-track proposal would be nice, too.


Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation

On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Iain Shigeoka wrote:

> On 11/13/02 11:05, "Richard Dobson" <richard at dobson-i.net> wrote:
> > It is missing an example of the current behaviour when you query for a
> > namespace that has not been previously stored, i.e. return the query as the
> > result.
> I agree. Peter, can you document this current behavior (queries of private
> data that doesn't exist on the server returns the query in the result, not
> an error or an empty result). It's confusing as hell if you aren't expecting
> it. Especially when implementing a server... You're left wondering what the
> client is waiting. :)
> I agree that improvements to iq:private as discussed in this thread may be
> worthy of a standards track document (separate from JEP 49).
> -iain
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list