[standards-jig] UPDATED: Multi-User Chat (JEP 45, v. 0.3)

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Wed Sep 18 08:51:56 UTC 2002

Hi Peter,

I dont know if this has already been discussed but the kicks band and whois
requests are being sent to room at server/admin wouldnt it make more sence to
just send it to room at server because sending it to /admin suggests you are
sending it to a user rather than the room, the server can easily filter it
out as a command and not send it to the participants. Other than that the
jep looks good, although something I would like to see is the only thing
that is missing from this that was in the generic conferencing protocol and
that is somehow defining a list of nicks to try and if not generate one.
Maybe it needs to be done as an extra step if wanted before sending presence
to a room to discover an unused or generate one for you which you can then
use to send to the room, maybe an iq get result sequence or something.


----- Original Message -----
>From: "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org>
To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 5:10 AM
Subject: [standards-jig] UPDATED: Multi-User Chat (JEP 45, v. 0.3)

> FYI, I have updated JEP #45 on Multi-User Chat. Version 0.3 contains
> changes large and small from version 0.2, including a total re-write of
> the admin use cases (resulting from a conversation I had with pgmillard).
> Many details remain to be addressed, including room moderation. I shall
> endeavor to release a further update by mid-day Thursday or so (that will
> probably be version 0.3.1 or whatever).
> So have at it!
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0045.html
> Peter
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation
> http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list