[standards-jig] Version 0.5 of JEP-0045

David Sutton jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Fri Sep 20 23:36:28 UTC 2002


Hmm - ok with making it so that you can only have one nick across the
service, wondering if we're going too far for nick registration service
.. MUC might just become IRC. Its an interesting line.

Regards,

  David

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:37:06AM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Actually, that raises a broader issue of registering your nick(s) with the
> chat service so that you can have the same nick across all the rooms on
> that service, and so that no one else can use your nick (e.g., I don't
> particularly want someone else in jdev at conference.jabber.org to use the
> nick stpeter when I'm not there).
> 
> Hmm. Now that sounds like a potential requirement. :)
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation
> http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> 
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Richard Dobson wrote:
> 
> > Well that will work for most uses, but if all of a clients favorite nicks
> > are used or there wernt any favorite nicks then it would be nice to generate
> > one for the client to use like in some IRC networks e.g. Guest45. Also it
> > may speed up nick negotiation to send them all in one go and just get back
> > something to use.
> > 
> > Other than that its great but this is one thing that I think it is missing
> > even tho it is not very important it would be nice to have.
> > 
> > Richard
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org>
> > To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [standards-jig] Version 0.5 of JEP-0045
> > 
> > 
> > > Until now nick negotiation has been handled by having a client save
> > > several favorite nicks in preferences or whatever; if the client receives
> > > a nick conflict error from the service, it simply sends the next favorite
> > > nick. Do you think something more formal is required?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > --
> > > Peter Saint-Andre
> > > Jabber Software Foundation
> > > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> > >
> > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Richard Dobson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great that looks much better, but as I have noted before, an optional
> > > > nick negotiation would be nice giving the possibility of server
> > > > generated nicks.
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 12:00  am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have just released version 0.5 of the Multi-User Chat JEP (#45):
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0045.html
> > > > >
> > > > > As always, comments are welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Peter Saint-Andre
> > > > > Jabber Software Foundation
> > > > > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > > > > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > > > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

-- 
David Sutton
Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20020920/7fba04c3/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list