[standards-jig] UPDATED: JEP-0004
temas at box5.net
Mon Sep 23 21:24:56 UTC 2002
> >You just broke all XPath parsers that want to treat fields the same.
> >You can no longer just reach into a field and say XPath("field/value")
> >and get back all of the values for the field. Just to save you from
> >having to look at a <value/> tag. XML is designed to be structured, and
> >often times structure interferes with ease of readability, but it sure
> >lets the computer rip through things since it is orderly.
> Hmm, now _that_ is a better argument :) Guess I have to ask how widely
> XPath is used in the jabber community... in the work i've done so far,
> it hasn't been worthwhile at all - forms processing has been pretty
> straightforward and I can reach in and get the stuff I need directly,
> without needing the power of XPath. Would like to hear others'
> experiences in this matter...
To reply specifically to the XPath stuff, many of the new clients are
heavily using XPath. Exodus and Gabber2 I know off hand, and I have two
libraries in development that use XPath extensively. The new
Net::Jabber also makes heavy (ok, _very_ heavy use of XPath) use.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards