[standards-jig] Voice and Video conferencing: need for a gene ric conferencing protocol ?

Joe Hildebrand JHildebrand at jabber.com
Wed Apr 2 16:20:46 UTC 2003


Yes, that's exactly what I was getting at.  Thank you for being able to
decipher my random mumblings into something concrete.  :)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CORVOYSIER David FTRD/DMI/REN
> [mailto:david.corvoysier at rd.francetelecom.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:47 AM
> To: standards-jig at jabber.org
> Subject: RE: [standards-jig] Voice and Video conferencing: need for a
> generic conferencing protocol ?
> 
> 
> > David, I'm not sure what you mean about MUC being dedicated to text.
> 
> Well Joe, that probably comes from me misunderstanding the MUC JEP !
> 
> So basically what you say is that when answering the 
> disco#info request, the conferencing service would respond 
> something like this:
> 
> <iq 
>     type='result'
>     from='macbeth.shakespeare.lit'
>     to='hag66 at shakespeare.lit/pda'
>     id='disco1'>
>   <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'>
>     <identity 
>         category='conference'
>         type='text'
>         name='Macbeth Chat Service'/>
>     <identity 
>         category='conference'
>         type='voice'
>         name='Macbeth Chat Service'/>
>     <feature var='gc-1.0'/>
>     <feature var='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc'/>
>     <feature var='http://jabber.org/protocol/tins'/>
>   </query>
> </iq>
> 
> (assuming here that TINS soon goes into the JEP process)
> 
> Is that correct ?
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 



More information about the Standards mailing list