[standards-jig] NEW: Message Delivery Semantics (JEP-0079)
rob at cataclysm.cx
Wed Apr 16 04:09:46 UTC 2003
> If you can think of a need for prefixes it's not that easy to think of
> one for suffixes or substrings either. Or at least, easyer than
> thinking of uses for subset matching ;)
Fair enough. Its trivial to implement either way :)
> That does bring up a question though. If a presence with lower priority
> matches my sub-/super-set exactly, and one with higher priority
> partially, it still goes to the highest priority resource?
I would say that exact matches trump partial matches. But this sort of
thing really should go into this JEP.
Alternatively, we could just say that if a packet arrives with delivery
semantics on it, then those semantics are processed in isolation. Only
when there are no matching sessions do the "traditional" (XMPP-IM) rules
come into effect.
Robert Norris GPG: 1024D/FC18E6C2
Email+Jabber: rob at cataclysm.cx Web: http://cataclysm.cx/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards