[standards-jig] 0k-authentication issues

Stephen Pendleton pendleto at movsoftware.com
Thu Apr 17 15:22:45 UTC 2003


Well in my case, I do agree that the current 0k spec should not be
implemented and therefore I never did attempt to implement it and kept with
the hash. It is a very good analysis you did though.

-----Original Message-----
From: standards-jig-admin at jabber.org
[mailto:standards-jig-admin at jabber.org]On Behalf Of Matthias Wimmer
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 3:32 AM
To: standards-jig at jabber.org
Subject: Re: [standards-jig] 0k-authentication issues


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi!


No reply to my message? Does that mean that everybody agrees/disagrees
with me message? Or is there just nobody that cares about these
problems? Maybe I wrote the message at the wrong time (week-end) or to
the wrong mailing list.


Tot kijk
~    Matthias

- --
Fon: +49-(0)70 0770 07770       http://matthias.wimmer.name/
Fax: +49-(0)89-312 88 654         jabber://mawis@charente.de
HAM: DB1MW     OpenPGP: http://matthias.wimmer.name/encrypt/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+nlhbJ/5jVqqDmvkRArQJAJ9K1n8dTUh7wGlXJHMWZ89GTasvywCdE4SN
waYUTvfUFuOnxhQRD/r64DE=
=+bDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Standards-JIG mailing list
Standards-JIG at jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig




More information about the Standards mailing list