[standards-jig] Jabber i18n proposal
jajcus at bnet.pl
Fri Apr 25 10:27:34 UTC 2003
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Sebastiaan Deckers wrote:
> This JEP does almost the same that you suggest.
I didn't know this.
> It was simply replaced
> by the IETF draft so I don't think we need another JEP documenting it.
> But I don't think we should use xml:lang on individual tags. Only on
> the tag with xmlns="...".
> <iq><query xmlns="sacre-blue" xml:lang="fr"><foo>bonjour</foo></query></iq>
> and not:
> <iq><query xmlns="sacre-blue"><foo xml:lang="fr">bonjour</foo></query></iq>
> Because keeping the xml:lang attribute in a known location would be a
> lot easier to parse and construct, I expect. (like xmlns="...")
I agree, but sometimes this may be not enough. xml:lang on individual
tags whould be just informational, and support for them in
clients/components whould not be a must.
> The specific usage of xml:lang should be documented in each JEP. There
> is no way to "add localization" to all existing JEPs with a new JEP.
I know. But a JEP may be used to give some directions.
More information about the Standards