[standards-jig] Re: Re: [Foundation] Motion for Last Call - Chat State Notifications (JEP-0085)

Alexander Gnauck gnauck at myjabber.net
Thu Dec 4 18:33:40 UTC 2003

> This is an interesting email... thanx for posting.
> I had never thought about the possible co-existance of -22 (but NOT
> composing) and chat-states but it does make a lot of sense.
> The reason why this JEP is better than simple -22 is your third
> bullet point.. It allows more states than JEP-22 does.

its no big deal to add additional states to JEP-22


More information about the Standards mailing list