[standards-jig] gateway handling of legacy contact lists
m at tthias.net
Wed Dec 17 00:54:40 UTC 2003
Hi Sebastiaan, hi Maqi (with the same reply)!
Sebastiaan Deckers schrieb am 2003-12-17 00:30:51:
> >Then the admin of example.com gets access to all your roster items that
> >belong to users on example.com.
> No, only if the server "example.com" is an item in the person's roster.
> The admin of example.com would only have access to the contacts
> "... at yahoo.example.com".
The user won't reject a subscription request from example.com and
therefore it won't be a problem for the admin to get access even with
There is currently just no reliable way to check if something is a
transport or not - and I guess makeing transport contacts not different
from other contacts is not a fault but intended by the designers of
I just don't understand why there should a problem if the client has to
cooperate for the roster updates. I agree, that there should be ways to
syncronize the other IM's contact list with the Jabber roster. But why
not making a real protocol for this?
Fon: +49-(0)70 0770 07770 http://matthias.wimmer.name/
HAM: DB1MW xmpp:mawis at charente.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Standards