[standards-jig] Re: JEP-0102

Peter Ronez prnz404 at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 3 15:29:17 UTC 2003


You're right. My apologies to Jean-Lious and everyone else on the list. The
comment doesn't make any point other than inflame the argument. I'm sorry.

--- Dave Smith <dizzyd at jabber.org> wrote:
> > BTW, is Antepo's Jabber solution truly XMPP complaint? As far as I can
> > tell Antepo's  doesn't support SASL nor the instream STARTTLS mechanism
> > as required by XMPP Core. Could it be that Antepo wants Jabber.org to
> > approve JEP-102 so that it can assure it's customers of a proper
> > authorization and encryption support while dragging its feet
> > implementing SASL and TLS as per XMPP Core?
> This is uncalled for, inflammatory, inappropriate speculation.
> Speaking as one who has made "uncalled for, inflammatory, inappropriate",
> speculative remarks in the past, I would encourage us all to avoid these
> sorts of personal attacks -- they are counter-productive.  I've found that
> as much fun as it is to blast how you really feel to the list, it
> ultimately hurts the community and slows innovation.
> Diz
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

More information about the Standards mailing list