[standards-jig] Re: JEP-0102
jean-louis.seguineau at antepo.com
Fri Jul 4 02:30:42 UTC 2003
No offense taken :)
Diz, Mr. speaker, thanks for a timely "situation defuser".
Everybody enjoy the holidays
----- Original Message -----
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Peter Ronez <prnz404 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [standards-jig] Re: JEP-0102
> To: standards-jig at jabber.org
> Reply-To: standards-jig at jabber.org
> You're right. My apologies to Jean-Lious and everyone else on the list.
> comment doesn't make any point other than inflame the argument. I'm sorry.
> --- Dave Smith <dizzyd at jabber.org> wrote:
> > > BTW, is Antepo's Jabber solution truly XMPP complaint? As far as I can
> > > tell Antepo's doesn't support SASL nor the instream STARTTLS
> > > as required by XMPP Core. Could it be that Antepo wants Jabber.org to
> > > approve JEP-102 so that it can assure it's customers of a proper
> > > authorization and encryption support while dragging its feet
> > > implementing SASL and TLS as per XMPP Core?
> > This is uncalled for, inflammatory, inappropriate speculation.
> > Speaking as one who has made "uncalled for, inflammatory,
> > speculative remarks in the past, I would encourage us all to avoid these
> > sorts of personal attacks -- they are counter-productive. I've found
> > as much fun as it is to blast how you really feel to the list, it
> > ultimately hurts the community and slows innovation.
> > Diz
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> End of Standards-JIG Digest
More information about the Standards