[standards-jig] Fw: JEP-102 XMPP Seccurity extension
temas at box5.net
Fri Jul 4 22:04:20 UTC 2003
I'm 100% interested in helping/co-authoring =) I'll reread all the
current arguments, and wait through the weekend for anything else, then
we'll see what we can do.
Jean-Louis Seguineau/EXC/ENG wrote:
> This the original first comment I received from temas (hope your feeling
> better), that I have not yet been able to address properly.
> One thing though, temas was already hinting at the JEP being too binding,
> and I can assure you that this is far from what I intended to convey. After
> all XMLEnc and XMLDsig are meant to be applied to any XML element, and when
> I describe the JEP as being a framework, I really meant that apart from
> certain mandatory packet structure (like in the key exchange part) the way
> other XMPP stanzas were to be encoded was pretty much left to the
> implementer. It is obviously not what is understood by the first commenters,
> and I can trace that to my redaction style. I such conditions, I could do
> with some help in that respect. Temas, in view of the draft you had started
> working on, would you like to co-author JEP102 ?
More information about the Standards