[standards-jig] informational vs. standards-track

Robert Norris rob at cataclysm.cx
Tue Jul 29 23:47:55 UTC 2003

> My rough and ready test is: if we're going to require a protocol 
> for compliance testing, it needs to be standards-track. Otherwise, 
> it should be informational. 
> So I think all new JEPs should be informational unless the author can
> provide a strong justification for making it standards-track.


Robert Norris                                       GPG: 1024D/FC18E6C2
Email+Jabber: rob at cataclysm.cx                Web: http://cataclysm.cx/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20030730/1c5db7f5/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list