[standards-jig] informational vs. standards-track

Casey Crabb crabbkw at nafai.dyndns.org
Wed Jul 30 18:52:22 UTC 2003


On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:33:02PM +0100, Richard Dobson wrote:
> > I'm definately +1 on this. Once something is 'accepted' as standard it
> > should move to a different list and be given a new number.
> 
> Why would it even need to be a number, I would think the name of the
> protocol would be best, as more numbers would introduce confusion, e.g.
> 
> JEP-0030 becomes simply Disco.
> 
> not
> 
> JEP-0030 becomes JES-0002 or some such.
> 
> Extra numbers just seem silly to me.

You're absolutely correct, the number is useless, just give it a name.

--
Casey



More information about the Standards mailing list