[standards-jig] informational vs. standards-track
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jul 30 22:27:04 UTC 2003
1. We have a page that lists standard protocols:
Yes, It would be best to transfer things from JEP format to just
a page there when they go Final (no more JEP number, just things
like "disco.html"). I intend to clean up that section of the website
after I get back from vacation next week.
2. All Experimental JEPs contain an explicit warning about the status
of the proposal. Should we also warn people about Informational JEPs?
Possibly. I'll do that after I get back from vacation next week.
3. We have a proposal that defines a standard protocol suite for minimal
functionality (JEP-0073), which will aligns with compliance testing
(whenever that happens, and whoever does it). I plan to push that
forward after I get back from vacation next week.
4. I consider everything else in this thread to be "sound and fury,
signifying nothing" -- but I look forward to catching up on the
progress of this and other flame wars after I get back from vacation
Oh, and did I mention that I'm going on vacation next week? Hot damn,
I'm looking forward to it!
"Carthago Delenda Est." -- Cato the Elder
More information about the Standards