[standards-jig] Comments on JEP-85: Chat State Notifications
dizzyd at jabber.org
Thu Jun 5 22:59:21 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Perhaps you can elaborate a bit on what you would cleanup and how?
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 10:10 America/Denver, Julian Missig wrote:
> On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 10:52 US/Eastern, Dave Smith wrote:
>> Are there any outstanding concerns/complaints about JEP-85? I'd like
>> to start building consensus around it so we can get the Council to
>> ratify it.
> I don't want to be rude or anything, but...
> I'm still pretty unconvinced that message events need to be replaced
> to begin with. I can see getting rid of having the x:event be in
> messages that are sent and relying on browse/disco to detect that
> I also don't generally see cases where we want to tell people to
> temporarily stop sending composing events where it's really worth the
> added protocol complexity.
> Basically, I'm pretty happy with the message events we have now. I
> could see making a few changes and such to simplify and remove extra
> cruft we don't need in the age of Disco, but I really don't want to
> have to implement both message events and chat state notifications,
> which means that chat state notifications would probably have to
> replace message events. We already have tons of clients, transports,
> etc. implementing message events--I think it would be more beneficial
> just to clean them up than to create a whole new thing.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards