[standards-jig] message formatting (XHTML IM)
jajcus at bnet.pl
Thu Jun 19 09:08:44 UTC 2003
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:00:01PM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> BTW, I'm also open to further simplifying XHTML IM if folks think that's
> valuable (no images, etc.).
O don't think it would be good. I would rather see more extensibility
with probably feature-negotiation or disco used to discover supported
extensions (like MathML).
Images are IMHO no problem at all, but image displaying should be
optional for security resons. But <img/> element should always be
supported and alt attribute used if non-empty.
> The simplicity of Textile is attractive, though. But I'm a structured
> information bigot, so I still tend to prefer something XML-ish.
Me to. But the idea of converting textile typed by user to XHTML before
sending seems fine to me.
More information about the Standards