[standards-jig] message formatting (XHTML IM)

Ralph Meijer jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu
Mon Jun 23 19:36:52 UTC 2003

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:41:21AM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:05:27PM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Next question: Are there any changes people would like to see in 
> > JEP-0071? I found a few nits over breakfast the other day, and I know
> > the schema needs fixing. Do client developers think the range of 
> > element and attribute support is too broad, too narrow, just right?
> > Do we really need <cite/> and <div/> and <q/>? What about the style
> > properties? Your friendly neighborhood protocol geek would like to know.
> OK, I plan to do the following:
> 1. Remove <cite/> and <q/>
> 2. Make <image/> a SHOULD
> What about <div/>? Should we keep that?

I would say: keep them. Default behaviour for any tag should be that if it
is unknown, the content is just rendered like the tag did not exist.

<div/> is <span/>'s block buddy. I say we should keep it.



More information about the Standards mailing list