[standards-jig] UPDATED: JEPs 95 and 96

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Wed Jun 25 01:54:56 UTC 2003

I feel this warrants a full restart.  Obviously this protocol should not
have been selected by one of the parties and it was a complete error. 
Plus, this would lead to all kinds of protocol issues, such as having to
return an ordered list of your preferred streams.  How do you know IBB
is the next one to try?  To me it's a full restart situation.


On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 20:39, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2003 09:25 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Thomas Muldowney has submitted updated versions of JEPs 95 and 96
> > (Stream Initiation and the file transfer profile for SI).
> Alright, well after a lot of thinking, I've decided that these JEPs are fine, 
> except for just one thing:  there doesn't appear to be a way to try different 
> stream attempts for the same application.
> For instance, it would be nice for an implementation of File Transfer to be 
> fully automated, so that if an s5b connection fails to establish, it can try 
> ibb without bothering the user about the s5b failure.  There is no provision 
> in these specs, as far as I can see, to even make this possible.
> -Justin
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list