[standards-jig] Avatars

Justin Karneges justin-jdev at affinix.com
Tue May 6 19:09:01 UTC 2003


Hmm, but until a JEP status is changed to 'Active', the semantics and syntax 
should be expected to change.  Experimental JEPs should not have to retain 
backwards compatibility with earlier revisions of themselves.

-Justin

On Tuesday 06 May 2003 11:29 am, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> >>>>> "DC" == Daniel Chote <daniel at chote.net> writes:
>
>     DC> Instead of doing a per client namespace (which i think is a
>     DC> stupid idea).  why take a jep revision based approach such as
>     DC> xmlns="http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0008.html/1.0"
>
> +1
>
> Or, maybe "http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0008.html#1.0", with the JEP
> XSL creating an <a name='1.0'> for each revision.
>
> The version is part of the namespace. As the semantics and syntax of
> the standard changes, the namespace changes, too.
>
> I also think this should be part of each JEP revision.
>
> ~ESP



More information about the Standards mailing list