justin-jdev at affinix.com
Tue May 6 19:09:01 UTC 2003
Hmm, but until a JEP status is changed to 'Active', the semantics and syntax
should be expected to change. Experimental JEPs should not have to retain
backwards compatibility with earlier revisions of themselves.
On Tuesday 06 May 2003 11:29 am, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> >>>>> "DC" == Daniel Chote <daniel at chote.net> writes:
> DC> Instead of doing a per client namespace (which i think is a
> DC> stupid idea). why take a jep revision based approach such as
> DC> xmlns="http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0008.html/1.0"
> Or, maybe "http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0008.html#1.0", with the JEP
> XSL creating an <a name='1.0'> for each revision.
> The version is part of the namespace. As the semantics and syntax of
> the standard changes, the namespace changes, too.
> I also think this should be part of each JEP revision.
More information about the Standards