[standards-jig] UPDATED: User Avatars (JEP-0084)
rcb at ceruleanstudios.com
Wed May 21 17:48:44 UTC 2003
> I also feel that this resolution cap is not based on any good reason.
> Scaling is what clients will be doing anyway. It's common sense.
Actually, my problem is not with the maximum size; that's fine, I can
accept a maximum avatar size. Most web-boards, LiveJournal, etc. all limit
you in the size of an image you can stick into a field.
But a minimum? I think as long as the image is valid, it should be okay.
If someone wants a 1x1 dot as their avatar, I can't think of why they
would, but I can't think of why that should be disallowed, either. :)
Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillian.cc/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards