[standards-jig] More on JEP-0078
dizzyd at jabber.org
Wed May 28 19:01:28 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 11:34 America/Denver, Evan Prodromou
> 1) Will programs that implement JEP-0078, but not SASL, be considered
> compliant for Jabber IM Basic 1.0?
I should imagine so. This is a good question for stpeter tho...
> 2) If the protocol in JEP-0078 is going to have different syntax and
> semantics from the widely-deployed 'jabber:iq:auth', then it really
> has to have another namespace.
The syntax is an addition, and doesn't break existing clients. As such,
there's no reason to create a new namespace, IMO.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards