[standards-jig] More on JEP-0078

Dave Smith dizzyd at jabber.org
Wed May 28 19:01:28 UTC 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 11:34 America/Denver, Evan Prodromou 
wrote:

> 1) Will programs that implement JEP-0078, but not SASL, be considered
>    compliant for Jabber IM Basic 1.0?

I should imagine so. This is a good question for stpeter tho...

> 2) If the protocol in JEP-0078 is going to have different syntax and
>    semantics from the widely-deployed 'jabber:iq:auth', then it really
>    has to have another namespace.

The syntax is an addition, and doesn't break existing clients. As such, 
there's no reason to create a new namespace, IMO.

Diz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE+1QeIYNE3chVHHsMRApOPAKCvAo4n1vRccnKteP7Qhh2afNE9wQCg3FWq
oAZAiKu3huuZvdvMAoEb0+A=
=1EYk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Standards mailing list