[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0045 (MUC) - Differences between the XMLSchemas definition and the examples

Gaston Dombiak dombiak_gaston at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 1 15:42:37 UTC 2004


Peter,

Thanks for the quick response. :)

  -- Gato

"Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote in message
news:20040331213541.GE20036 at jabber.org...
> I've updated the muc#user schema:
>
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0045.html#schemas-user
>
> /psa
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:51:00PM -0300, Gaston Dombiak wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While destroying a room I see that the service removes each occupant.
Each
> > occupant will receive a stanza like this:
> >
> > <presence
> >     from='heath at macbeth.shakespeare.lit/firstwitch'
> >     to='crone1 at shakespeare.lit/desktop'
> >     type='unavailable'>
> >   <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'>
> >     <item affiliation='none' role='none'/>
> >     <destroy jid='darkcave at macbeth.shakespeare.lit'>
> >       <reason>Macbeth doth come.</reason>
> >     </destroy>
> >   </x>
> > </presence>
> >
> > In the XML Schemas I don't see the destroy element as a valid element of
x
> > in the namespace http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user. So my question is
who
> > is correct? Is the definition correct or the destroy element is a valid
> > element?
> >
> > My other question is if the alt element is being used? I don't see any
> > mention of it in the JEP document but it's being defined in the XML
Schema.
> > If the alt element is a valid element then I would like to know what's
the
> > meaning of that element?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >   -- Gato
> >






More information about the Standards mailing list