[Standards-JIG] UPDATED: JEP-0111 (TINS)

Joe Hildebrand jhildebrand at jabber.com
Tue Apr 6 15:08:10 UTC 2004


STUN is orthogonal to session initiation.  You can do the same STUN 
things to calculate your IP address to send in the SDP document that 
you would in SIP.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand
Denver, CO, USA

On Apr 5, 2004, at 6:44 PM, Nanda Kutty wrote:

> Has anyone addressed how the TINS protocol and
> STUN protocol can intermingle?
>
> For example, both users might exist behing a NAT
> router. In which case, they might use STUN to determine
> their 'private' and 'public' addresses. They
> should be submitting BOTH the addressing during the
> negotiation phase since the other party might
> exist within the same subnet (in which case it uses
> the private address) or it might not (in which
> case it uses the public address). Is this something
> that is should be part of the inlined SDP or
> does TINS need to be extended to include this?
>
> nanda kutty
> nanda at wingmanteam.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org
> [mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Peter 
> Saint-Andre
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: standards-jig at jabber.org
> Subject: [Standards-JIG] UPDATED: JEP-0111 (TINS)
>
>
> I've fixed TINS so that it uses <message/> rather than <iq/> -- we 
> can't
> use <iq/> because SIP allows multiple responses after a request, which
> does not map to the semantics as defined in XMPP Core.
>
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0111.html
>
> Peter
>
> -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig




More information about the Standards mailing list