[Standards-JIG] SASL and JEP-0124

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Mon Apr 12 19:23:19 UTC 2004

> Peter wrote:
> > I wonder if the distinction is all that valuable. A transmit
> > with no child would then really be the same as poll, no?
> Yes. If people think that it makes implementaion easier, then in the new
> version of JEP-0124 the types 'transmit' and 'poll' could be merged into
> optional type 'normal'?

What about simply omitting the type altogether in this instance, just like
we do in message and in presence to indicate a default value, it would also
help eliminate a few bytes that arnt strictly needed.


More information about the Standards mailing list