[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC+

Nolan Eakins sneakin at semanticgap.com
Tue Dec 28 15:38:04 UTC 2004


Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> If you wanted to refactor MUC, why don't you just say "support
> JEP-50", and have all of the different grant/revoke use cases just be
> commands?

Because it's a refactor and not a complete redesign, and I wanted to ensure
that older clients would still work with MUC+ as much as possible.

- Nolan
 
-- 
http://www.semanticgap.com/people/sneakin/




More information about the Standards mailing list