[standards-jig] jep-0071 img tag

SEN sendel2000 at hotbox.ru
Thu Feb 5 06:18:32 UTC 2004


May be, May be...
I tink that will correct if client get object in message:

 <message type='chat' from='src at example.com/client' to='dest at example.com'>
      <body>Hello mate :-)</body>
      <html xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/xhtml-im'>
          <body xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
              Hello mate <img src='cid:id1'/>
          </body>
      </html>
      <obj xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/iobj' cid='id1' type='image/gif' encode='base64'>
        <body>HfghYGbYHNjklIGBHJ,KIYG=</body>
      </obj>
  </message>


and must support  and this... (default)
<obj xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/iobj' cid='id1' 
id='552da749930852c69ae5d2141d3766b1'/>

Richard Dobson wrote:

>No definatelly not, that is a very bad thing IMO, if you are wanting to be
>able to send images without having to post them onto an HTTP server first a
>protocol is already in development, and preparing to be made into a full
>JEP.
>
>http://www.jabber.org/wiki/index.php/XHTML%20Inband%20Images
>
>Richard
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "SEN" <sendel2000 at hotbox.ru>
>To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
>Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 10:50 AM
>Subject: [standards-jig] jep-0071 img tag
>
>
>  
>
>>I think that, user must have possible sen image in message as base64
>>example:
>><img base64="HjbnGGjm,OIUnh=" height= width= .../>
>>
>>and may be other multimedia make as it...
>>
>><melody base64="HIONmjknuuiUJ=" format="mp3"/>
>>format=mp3,midi,wav.... and other
>>
>><video base64="HVYNnklmklUGj=" format="mpeg"/>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Standards-JIG mailing list
>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>  
>





More information about the Standards mailing list