[standards-jig] XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Mon Jan 5 13:44:03 UTC 2004


Could we not create a new URI syntax similar to the way multipart/related
emails work? So that either the image is attached to the message or
indicates where the client can download it from using IBB or from public
storage.

e.g. multipart/related emails attach all the images inline and in the HTML
put something like.

<img src="cid:123456789">

where the cid refers to the image cid attached to the email.

Richard

----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Mike Mintz" <mikemintz190261 at hypothetic.org>
To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [standards-jig] XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images


> A client that is capable of XHTML could be programmed to include a mini
HTTP
> server and serve the image off of localhost.  This would be just like OOB
> file transfer I think.  Sure there would be issues with firewalls, but for
> users without firewalls, the client could take away the difficulty of
> uploading an image to a public website and linking to it.
>
> How would you send an image in-band and still be valid XHTML?  Is there an
> accepted method for this, or would you have to send it separate from the
> XHTML?
>
> On Sunday 04 January 2004 04:05 pm, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> > Yes. What about sending in-band images instead attaching out-of-band
> > <img/> links?
> > Publishing a picture on the web is quite inconvinient for someone that
> > just wants to send a small picture to a friend. Not everyone has a
> > public web site.
> > And sending an image in-band has no security issues that hyperlinked
> > images have.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>




More information about the Standards mailing list