[standards-jig] XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images
richard at dobson-i.net
Mon Jan 5 13:44:03 UTC 2004
Could we not create a new URI syntax similar to the way multipart/related
emails work? So that either the image is attached to the message or
indicates where the client can download it from using IBB or from public
e.g. multipart/related emails attach all the images inline and in the HTML
put something like.
where the cid refers to the image cid attached to the email.
----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mike Mintz" <mikemintz190261 at hypothetic.org>
To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [standards-jig] XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images
> A client that is capable of XHTML could be programmed to include a mini
> server and serve the image off of localhost. This would be just like OOB
> file transfer I think. Sure there would be issues with firewalls, but for
> users without firewalls, the client could take away the difficulty of
> uploading an image to a public website and linking to it.
> How would you send an image in-band and still be valid XHTML? Is there an
> accepted method for this, or would you have to send it separate from the
> On Sunday 04 January 2004 04:05 pm, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> > Yes. What about sending in-band images instead attaching out-of-band
> > <img/> links?
> > Publishing a picture on the web is quite inconvinient for someone that
> > just wants to send a small picture to a friend. Not everyone has a
> > public web site.
> > And sending an image in-band has no security issues that hyperlinked
> > images have.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards