[standards-jig] Re: XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Tue Jan 6 00:22:16 UTC 2004


Sure of course, that was only the initial brainstorming suggestion, we all
need to discuss and refine it to make it the best thing we all can.

Richard

----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf at outer-planes.net>
To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [standards-jig] Re: XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images


> I would suggest we not be so specific, and allow the file to be
> retrieved via SI (JEP-0095), which includes the (possible) use of IBB.
>
>
> -  LW
>
> Tomasz Sterna wrote:
>
> >W liście z pon, 05-01-2004, godz. 19:56, Alexander Gnauck pisze:
> >
> >
> >>>Yes. What about sending in-band images instead attaching out-of-band
> >>><img/> links?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>i think this is a very good idea. As a client developer i would really
> >>like to do that for emote icons. On the other side its lots of more
> >>traffic. So we should find a way that one client can request the
> >>pictures/animations/videos from the other client. When requested them
> >>once then the client could store them temporary.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I think Richard suggested a very good solution.
> >We could develop a separate protocol for requesting images via IBB.
> >Something like: jibi://user@jabber.srv/imgidentifier.png
> >Client should cache these images at least for the session time
> >(I think it would cache it forever for later usage as clipart gallery
> >for own messages :-)
> >When an in-band image is linked in <img/> tag, client should check if it
> >has the image in local storage and if not get it via IBB.
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
>




More information about the Standards mailing list