[standards-jig] XHTML-IM (JEP-0071) and in-band images
tomek at smoczy.net
Tue Jan 13 05:08:03 UTC 2004
W liście z pią, 09-01-2004, godz. 10:47, Richard Dobson pisze:
> > > NAT doesnt present a problem as the point of using SI/filetransfer is
> > > that it can transfer P2P is possible and if not fall back to IBB.
> > Is that fallback defined and standard or at the client author
> > discretion?
> No its a MUST requirement in the file transfer protocol to support IBB.
It theory everything looks fine.
But life had already prooven, that we cannot rely on it.
And since it is so big problem for server administrators, they _will_ be
blocking and/or restricting usage of IBB.
And since it is so big problem for server administrators, maybe it would
be a good idea to rethink the usage of IBB.
JID:smoku at chrome.pl
More information about the Standards