stpeter at jabber.org
Sat Jan 17 00:04:41 UTC 2004
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
> JEP-124 is certainly a different way to perform an HTTP polling connection,
> but I hope it doesn't qualify as a complete replacement.
> JEP-25 is nice because it doesn't reinvent xmpp-core. Not only does this make
> it very easy to program (developers get to re-use their same xmpp-core code),
> but it also gives us access to features like TLS and SASL stream encryption,
> which are absent from JEP-124.
Please. The point is develop ONE solution that addresses all needs
(or at least 80% of the needs). If you have problems with JEP-0124,
please specify them so the JEP authors can adjust the protocol and
get it right this time.
More information about the Standards