thoutbeckers at splendo.com
Sun Jan 18 21:44:41 UTC 2004
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:04:41 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
>> JEP-124 is certainly a different way to perform an HTTP polling
>> but I hope it doesn't qualify as a complete replacement.
>> JEP-25 is nice because it doesn't reinvent xmpp-core. Not only does
>> this make
>> it very easy to program (developers get to re-use their same xmpp-core
>> but it also gives us access to features like TLS and SASL stream
>> which are absent from JEP-124.
> Please. The point is develop ONE solution that addresses all needs
> (or at least 80% of the needs). If you have problems with JEP-0124,
> please specify them so the JEP authors can adjust the protocol and
> get it right this time.
Do you mean the goal of the JEP and the target audience of JEP-0025 and
JEP-0124 should be the same? I don't think they are now..
More information about the Standards