[standards-jig] about XML framing issue
jhildebrand at jabber.com
Sat Jan 31 06:22:21 UTC 2004
In-Band Bytestreams (IBB) may do what you want:
but I agree with the others, that except for file transfer, the framing
thing doesn't come up much for us.
Denver, CO, USA
On Jan 29, 2004, at 7:31 PM, john wrote:
> Thank you, Ralph, I got it.
> So if an XML document is too large, it will be partitioned into
> smaller XML frames for routing and transferring purpose, just like
> that has been done for TCP/IP, am I right?
> and a following question is the order of the frames when received by
> the listener. Is there any document about this? Thanks.
> Ralph Meijer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:03:16PM -0500, john wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have a question about XML framing mechanism in Jabber, is one frame
> still bounded by XML start/close tags, or it's already changed to be
> bounded by byte-length. thanks.
> It is still bounded by just XML tags. Seeing the recent approval of
> as proposed standard by the IETF, this will probably not change for
> But I can imagine someone proposing another protocol for transporting
> stanzas using some kind of framing.
More information about the Standards