[Standards-JIG] message events in MUC
jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Thu Jul 1 21:30:47 UTC 2004
+1 to this suggestion - if its an option, I am happier with that.
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:58:11PM -0700, JD Conley wrote:
>>I'm fine with verbiage like: "A client SHOULD NOT send JEP-0020 or
>>JEP-0085 notifications and a service implementation MAY block these
>>stanzas to conserve bandwidth." I could see this as an option in the
>>configuration form of a room.
> I would rather like "A client MUST NOT send JEP-0020 or JEP-0085
> notification unless the service announces support for that". Or even
> better: that should be more generic, so any extension namespace in
> groupchat is forbidden unles it is explicitly allowed. Disco request to
> the room could be used to discover extensions allowed.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards