[Standards-JIG] message events in MUC

David Sutton jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Thu Jul 1 21:30:47 UTC 2004

Hi all,

   +1 to this suggestion - if its an option, I am happier with that.



Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:58:11PM -0700, JD Conley wrote:
>>I'm fine with verbiage like: "A client SHOULD NOT send JEP-0020 or
>>JEP-0085 notifications and a service implementation MAY block these
>>stanzas to conserve bandwidth."  I could see this as an option in the
>>configuration form of a room.
> I would rather like "A client MUST NOT send JEP-0020 or JEP-0085
> notification unless the service announces support for that". Or even
> better: that should be more generic, so any extension namespace in
> groupchat is forbidden unles it is explicitly allowed. Disco request to
> the room could be used to discover extensions allowed.
> Greets,
> 	Jacek
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list