[Standards-JIG] Re: XMPP bandwidth compression
jconley at winfessor.com
Fri Jul 9 19:11:53 UTC 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Hancke [mailto:fippo at goodadvice.pages.de]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 10:51 AM
> To: Jabber protocol discussion list
> Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Re: XMPP bandwidth compression
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >>Aren't the bandwidth issues even worse for SIMPLE? From the sample
> >>that I've seen, it would surely seem so.
> > SIMPLE's bandwidth requirements are at least 3 or 4 times larger
> > XMPP's, and it will be a while before those folks have a protocol
> > alone implementations) that will replace IRC.
> As you seem to believe that you can... where is the Jabber equivalent
> IRCs channel?
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards