[Standards-JIG] Proposed Changes to JEP-60 - PubSub

Fletcher, Boyd C. J9C534 Boyd.Fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Thu Jun 3 20:34:15 UTC 2004


they do have significant meaning when creating sub-nodes and performing actions on items and nodes.

boyd
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org 
> [mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Jacek Konieczny
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:59 AM
> To: Jabber protocol discussion list
> Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Proposed Changes to JEP-60 - PubSub
> 
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:41:17AM -0400, Fletcher, Boyd C. 
> J9C534 wrote:
> > please  re-read the specification again. paying particular 
> attention 
> > to things like NodeID and ItemID naming
> 
> NodeID and ItemID are just opaque identifiers with no other 
> meaning as far as PubSub protocol is concerned. The ID of 
> node of interest should be gained by other means (usually 
> disco), which are defined by a higher-level protocol.
> 
> Greets,
> 	Jacek
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
> 
> 



More information about the Standards mailing list