[Standards-JIG] message events in MUC

David Sutton jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Wed Jun 30 19:20:37 UTC 2004


Hi there,

  I agree with keeping message events out of MUC - not only would this get confusing with very large rooms, the traffic 
load would also increase greatly. 

Regards,

  David

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:39:08AM -0700, JD Conley wrote:
> I wondered this as well when I was doing a MUC implementation a while
> back.  However, I agree with the original MUC authors.  In my opinion,
> chat state notifications can be a bit "chatty" for an open chat room.
> It would at least double the load on the MUC server, and use a lot more
> bandwidth.  It's fine for private chats, but we shouldn't use it when
> broadcasting.
> 
> JD
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter at jabber.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 8:38 AM
> To: standards-jig at jabber.org
> Subject: [Standards-JIG] message events in MUC
> 
> Fixing something else in JEP-0045 just now, I noticed that the business
> rules prohibit a client from sending JEP-0020 message events (no mention
> of JEP-0085 chat state notifications) through a groupchat room. Do
> people
> think this is right? Loosening this seems fine with me.
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0045.html#bizrules-message
> 
> This raises the issue of JEP-0020 vs. JEP-0085, but that's a can of
> worms
> we might not want to open right now...
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig

-- 
David Sutton
Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk



More information about the Standards mailing list