[Standards-JIG] new top level tag?

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Tue Mar 9 11:20:52 UTC 2004

> when working on RTP XMPP integration i suddenly had the sudden flash of
> an idea:
> a new top level tag.
> it's not yet fully worked out, but it seems reasonable in some situations.

A new top level tag would AFAIK have to go through the IETF process, it
doesnt seem worth the hassle, it would be far better if this used the iq

> i.e.:
> establish a 1-to-1 session on the server
> both clients request personal relays on the server:
> client A/B requests relay
> <rtp to='rtprelay.com'>
> <request>
> <session type='private' id='abcd'></session>
> </request>
> </rtp>
> server returns to both romeo and julia their personal RTP urls.
> <rtp to='<jid> <to=%27 at romeo.org>'>
> <session type='private' id='abcd'>
> <streamurl>rtp://rtprelay.com:9001/romeoinput.rm</streamurl>
> <recurl>rtp://rtprelay.com/romeoinput.rm</recurl>
> <sessionhashkey>somepersonalhash</sessionhashkey>
> </session>
> </rtp>


More information about the Standards mailing list