[Standards-JIG] new top level tag?
us at die-horde.de
Tue Mar 9 11:23:35 UTC 2004
Richard Dobson wrote:
>>when working on RTP XMPP integration i suddenly had the sudden flash of
>>a new top level tag.
>>it's not yet fully worked out, but it seems reasonable in some situations.
>A new top level tag would AFAIK have to go through the IETF process, it
>doesnt seem worth the hassle, it would be far better if this used the iq
>>establish a 1-to-1 session on the server
>>both clients request personal relays on the server:
>>client A/B requests relay
>><session type='private' id='abcd'></session>
>>server returns to both romeo and julia their personal RTP urls.
>><rtp to='<jid> <to=%27 at romeo.org>'>
>><session type='private' id='abcd'>
should be mentioned that the URLs can well be the same urls for
streaming and recieving - multicast url is possible too.
More information about the Standards