[Standards-JIG] new top level tag?

Ulrich Staudinger us at die-horde.de
Tue Mar 9 11:23:35 UTC 2004


Richard Dobson wrote:

>>when working on RTP XMPP integration i suddenly had the sudden flash of
>>an idea:
>>a new top level tag.
>>it's not yet fully worked out, but it seems reasonable in some situations.
>>    
>>
>
>A new top level tag would AFAIK have to go through the IETF process, it
>doesnt seem worth the hassle, it would be far better if this used the iq
>mechanism.
>
>  
>
ok.



>>i.e.:
>>establish a 1-to-1 session on the server
>>both clients request personal relays on the server:
>>client A/B requests relay
>>
>><rtp to='rtprelay.com'>
>><request>
>><session type='private' id='abcd'></session>
>></request>
>></rtp>
>>
>>server returns to both romeo and julia their personal RTP urls.
>>
>><rtp to='<jid> <to=%27 at romeo.org>'>
>><session type='private' id='abcd'>
>><streamurl>rtp://rtprelay.com:9001/romeoinput.rm</streamurl>
>><recurl>rtp://rtprelay.com/romeoinput.rm</recurl>
>><sessionhashkey>somepersonalhash</sessionhashkey>
>></session>
>></rtp>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
should be mentioned that the URLs can well be the same urls for 
streaming and recieving - multicast url is possible too.






More information about the Standards mailing list