[Standards-JIG] new top level tag?

Ralph Meijer jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu
Wed Mar 10 09:35:03 UTC 2004

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:24:23AM -0000, Richard Dobson wrote:
> ... This might be "nice" as a new top level element but the effort that
> is required to support it is a complete waste since we already have iq which
> can be used perfectly adequately.

Exactly. Thanks!



More information about the Standards mailing list