[Standards-JIG] new top level tag?

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Wed Mar 10 17:46:43 UTC 2004

>>> You definitely have a point here. Servers need to support the
>>> routing of this new tag and IQ tags can deliver this specific
>>> content as well [...]

>> True, but I think you would have a very hard time justifying the effort
>> required to support this when we already have IQ, [...]

> The only reason that would justify the new tag is if the routing and
> processing rules are significantly different from IQ. If they are, then
> a new tag is justified and fairly compelling.

> If the routing rules are the same as, or similar to, IQ, then it's not
> worth looking at.

And even if the routing/processing rules are not completely the same it
would still have to be proven that they could not be modified to fit in with


More information about the Standards mailing list