[Standards-JIG] UPDATED: JEP-0027 (Current Jabber OpenPGP Usa ge)
jajcus at bnet.pl
Tue Mar 16 08:02:37 UTC 2004
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:14:58PM -0800, Justin Karneges wrote:
> This means that we could store bare JIDs in RFC 882 form, such as:
> Justin Karneges <justin at andbit.net>
> or by creating our own format, such as:
> im:justin at andbit.net
> I prefer the former, because it extends the notion of the "user at host.com"
> format as a non-protocol-specific universal ID, which I feel is more in line
> with PGP's purpose. However, I remember an argument last year advocating the
> latter, to cover domain configurations that provision the same username to
> two different people depending on service/protocol. Do we really need to go
IMHO booth should be possible. But I would use prefix "jid:", "jabber:"
If no of "prefixed" key ids is known, then the key with matching email
is to be used as the 'universal' key.
More information about the Standards