[Standards-JIG] JEP-0045 (MUC) - Differences between the XML Schemas definition and the examples

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Mar 31 20:44:15 UTC 2004

It looks like I didn't update the schema for muc#user to track protocol
changes. I'll fix that now.


On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:51:00PM -0300, Gaston Dombiak wrote:
> Hi all,
> While destroying a room I see that the service removes each occupant. Each
> occupant will receive a stanza like this:
> <presence
>     from='heath at macbeth.shakespeare.lit/firstwitch'
>     to='crone1 at shakespeare.lit/desktop'
>     type='unavailable'>
>   <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'>
>     <item affiliation='none' role='none'/>
>     <destroy jid='darkcave at macbeth.shakespeare.lit'>
>       <reason>Macbeth doth come.</reason>
>     </destroy>
>   </x>
> </presence>
> In the XML Schemas I don't see the destroy element as a valid element of x
> in the namespace http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user. So my question is who
> is correct? Is the definition correct or the destroy element is a valid
> element?
> My other question is if the alt element is being used? I don't see any
> mention of it in the JEP document but it's being defined in the XML Schema.
> If the alt element is a valid element then I would like to know what's the
> meaning of that element?
> Thanks,
>   -- Gato

More information about the Standards mailing list